The New York Times, MSN, and a million music-obsessed blogs have commented on this phenomenon, and perhaps that merely underscores its pervasiveness rather than the irrelevancy of this post. Or, most likely, it’s both.
The album does not exist anymore. I have over 250 GB of music. I have no idea how many artists or albums went into creating that number. I listen to a small percentage of that music to be fair, but I keep it because of that niggling need within me that has me thinking of a song and running home just to find it and appease the craving. I have about fifteen versions of some songs and no appreciation for their individual significance; live performances, demos, single and album versions, and covers, and I keep them partially from a digital packrat disorder, and also because I want the choice of listening per album or per group—as a way of organization rather than a sense of something finite. But the album still doesn’t exist.
My sister shaped my musical taste, partially. She’s ten years older than I am, and as such she was more interested in watching MTV than Sesame Street. However, I took in far more than the glossy, Top 40 sound she was obsessed with. Somehow, perhaps reverse osmosis, I grew to like Lloyd Cole and the Commotions, the Stranglers, Depeche Mode, and Joy Division. I guarantee you that my sister is only familiar with DM.
Yet, my musical tastes were patchy, and it has only been through the past ten years that I’ve become familiar and grew passionate for other types of music that were the inspiration for the music I enjoyed, or which sprung from it. I’ve stolen music from friends, copying CDs and files of bands that I’d never heard of, or were only vaguely aware, to see if I liked them too, just because I wanted an opinion rather than to remain ignorant.
As such, my understanding of these bands is quite different from those who came to them at the time they produced their music. I don’t have memories of individual albums, anticipating the natural song progression as it plays through the speakers. While there are bands that I know this intimately, my knowledge has been bastardized by large blocks of songs in alphabetical order by artist. I listen to random play and therefore don’t know the exact titles of the songs, complete with random parenthetical comments, a natural extension of sweatily reading the liner notes immediately upon purchasing an album. I can’t tell you each individual album a song was included, nor which were singles albums. Sometimes my downloading habits are such that I don’t even know the title of a song, the artist, or the album it sprung from while I’m listening to it. Doesn’t help matters much when it’s included in a mix, which further complicates the issue.
The thing is...I’m not sure it really matters. I like what I listen to, but I’m not a slavish devotee, and if I was that obsessed with it, I’d be involved in the creation of music, or I’d be a far more annoying individual than I already am. The last thing I need is for people to think of me as a music snob, on top of everything else.
29 August 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

9 comments:
Is it possible for you to be more annoying than you are?
Dude, I used to be far more annoying than I am now. Don't pretend you don't remember the "Bitter Year(s)."
At 250 GB you are a slavish devotee. But I am impressed at your collection.
That must be nearly every song created by man or beast. I only have about 9GB and that is so many songs. I have 8.12GB at 2063 songs. Apparently it would take me 6 days 24/7 to listen to all those songs. You must have about 64,500 songs that would take you 190 days to listen.
I have a little over 60 GB that I keep on my iTunes, and that comes out to over 8600 songs and 29.6 days of music. So...if I put all of my music on there, that would be a lot more.
I guess my point was that when music was purchased as a finite item, each song and album seemed to mean more. I can download mixes and music like candy, and it loses its individual impact as a result.
I don't think of myself as a slave to music though. Not in the way that some people define themselves through the music they listen to. I like so much, and there is a real eclecticism in my choices. I'll listen to Fleetwood Mac and then some French House music. I love it that way.
Me to. And I am enjoying this get to know Amanda day.
Fleetwood Mac - *sigh*
memories of my first love..
And I agree, you had to really like a song/songs to shed out your cash but download is easy so I tend to download stuff Ive only even heard of
Shit, Ive just admitted to free downloading haven't I...
I don't pirate, per se. I download the mixes and things from the linked music blogs, but I think of that as something different. I tell myself that it's educational.
Thanks Ryan. This is more fun than I should admit to.
Confession: I do no illegal download, but I do borrow CDs and upload.
I have about 200 gigs. But it is all Boston, Journey, ABBA, Stix and Supertramp. I don't have remixes so much as multiple copies of the same album saved over and over on my hard drive.
I think I have over 200 copies of the "Breakfast In American" album saved on my E: drive.
Post a Comment